Dershowitz, Reed swap verbal punches on church-state issue
The president's plan to fund religious groups takes center stage in
a Portland debate between political opposites
Friday, February 23, 2001
By Harry Esteve of The Oregonian staff
The ever-moving line that separates religion from government in the
United States came under intense scrutiny Thursday night during a lively
Portland debate between liberal lawyer Alan Dershowitz and conservative
political strategist Ralph Reed.
Much of the discussion focused on President Bush's efforts to give
federal money to "faith-based" organizations that help needy or troubled
people.
Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor whose clients have included John
Lennon and O.J. Simpson, called the proposal a dangerous mixing of dogma
and dollars that telegraphs the president's coziness with the Christian
right. Bush got off to a bad start when two ministers at his inauguration
presented heavily Christian messages, he said.
"I worry deeply that what we're hearing is simply the camel's nose in
the tent," Dershowitz said. "We're beginning with faith-based institution
and state support of that, and the goal is to move toward the
establishment of religion."
But Reed, the former director of the Christian Coalition who has worked
closely with Bush on policy issues, chided Dershowitz for exaggerating the
issue as one that threatens the country's long-standing "wall" between
church and state.
"There's an attempt to make this appear more controversial than it is,"
Reed said of Bush's plan, which would give religious groups direct federal
grants to be used for social services. Faith groups already receive
enormous amounts of federal money for their humanitarian programs and have
for years, he said.
Some people "believe politics should be a religion-free zone," Reed
said. "They believe that religion, like pornography, should best be
understood and enjoyed in private."
The new administration and most conservative Republicans believe that
"faith has a role," Reed said, and "that government can embrace and
accommodate faith without imposing it."
The debate was part of the Tom McCall Forum, which for 19 years has
brought together high-profile representatives of the right and left
political wings for an exchange of ideas. Founded and sponsored by Pacific
University in Forest Grove, the forum has pitted the likes of Robert
Kennedy Jr. against former Vice President Dan Quayle and Democratic
strategist James Carville against his Republican wife, Mary Matalin.
Thursday night's event, held before an appreciative crowd in Arlene
Schnitzer Concert Hall, upheld the tradition of candid and animated
conversation. Dershowitz, a dramatic and flamboyant speaker, kept the
audience entertained with impersonations and sharp one-liners. The more
subdued Reed held his ground with pointed rebuttals and dry humor.
Dershowitz said Bush's efforts to incorporate religion into his
leadership already have backfired, as mainstream churches become more and
more nervous about the prospect of fringe religions applying for federal
money. Already there has been concern expressed about the possibility of
aid going to Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam or the Hare Krishnas.
"When the first group of witches come and stand outside with their
cauldrons, asking for money, it's going to be a problem," Dershowitz said.
Those concerns could lead to the government establishing a list of
"approved" religions, which is an obvious infringement on the First
Amendment, Dershowitz said.
Reed said the government would be free to reject applications from
groups that discriminate or disregard the civil rights of others but would
not make distinctions based on religious beliefs.
.